From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Wallace v. Michigan Computation Bd.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION
Mar 29, 2012
Case No. 12-11296 (E.D. Mich. Mar. 29, 2012)

Opinion

Case No. 12-11296

03-29-2012

ANTOINE WALLACE, Plaintiff, v. MICHIGAN COMPUTATION BOARD, Defendant.


Honorable David M. Lawson


ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR APPOINTMENT OF COUNSEL

The matter is before the Court on the plaintiff's motion for appointment of counsel. "'[A]ppointment of counsel in a civil case is . . . a matter within the discretion of the court. It is a privilege not a right.'" Childs v. Pellegrin, 822 F.2d 1382, 1384 (6th Cir. 1987) (quoting U.S. v. Madden, 352 F.2d 792, 793 (9th Cir. 1965)). The plaintiff has failed to present convincing reasons as to why this Court should exercise its discretionary power at this time.

Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the plaintiff's application for appointment of counsel [dkt #3] is DENIED.

______________________

DAVID M. LAWSON

United States District Judge

PROOF OF SERVICE

The undersigned certifies that a copy of the foregoing order was served upon each attorney or party of record herein by electronic means or first class U.S. mail on March 29, 2012.

DEBORAH R. TOFIL


Summaries of

Wallace v. Michigan Computation Bd.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION
Mar 29, 2012
Case No. 12-11296 (E.D. Mich. Mar. 29, 2012)
Case details for

Wallace v. Michigan Computation Bd.

Case Details

Full title:ANTOINE WALLACE, Plaintiff, v. MICHIGAN COMPUTATION BOARD, Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION

Date published: Mar 29, 2012

Citations

Case No. 12-11296 (E.D. Mich. Mar. 29, 2012)