From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Wallace v. Lynch

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Aug 30, 2021
2:20-cv-02265-TLN-DB (E.D. Cal. Aug. 30, 2021)

Opinion

2:20-cv-02265-TLN-DB

08-30-2021

CLEVELAND WALLACE; RITA WALLACE, Claimant at Law, Plaintiffs, v. ROSEMARY LYNCH, et al., Defendants.


ORDER

Troy L. Nunley, United States District Judge

Plaintiffs are proceeding pro se with the above-entitled action. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to Local Rule 302(c)(21).

On May 20, 2021, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which were served on all parties and which contained notice that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within thirty days after service of the findings and recommendations. The thirty-day period has expired, and Plaintiffs have filed objections to the findings and recommendations.

The Court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by the magistrate judge's analysis.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The findings and recommendations filed May 20, 2021 (ECF No. 14) are adopted in full;

2. Plaintiff s November 13, 2020 complaint (ECF No. 1) is dismissed without prejudice;

3. Defendants' April 28, 2021 ex parte application (ECF No. 11) is denied as having been rendered moot; and

4. This action is closed.


Summaries of

Wallace v. Lynch

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Aug 30, 2021
2:20-cv-02265-TLN-DB (E.D. Cal. Aug. 30, 2021)
Case details for

Wallace v. Lynch

Case Details

Full title:CLEVELAND WALLACE; RITA WALLACE, Claimant at Law, Plaintiffs, v. ROSEMARY…

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of California

Date published: Aug 30, 2021

Citations

2:20-cv-02265-TLN-DB (E.D. Cal. Aug. 30, 2021)