From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Wallace v. Goodstein

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Feb 21, 2008
48 A.D.3d 319 (N.Y. App. Div. 2008)

Opinion

No. 2849.

February 21, 2008.

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Karen S. Smith, J.), entered September 18, 2006, which denied defendants' motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Thomas D. Hughes, New York (Richard C. Rubinstein of counsel), for appellants.

Glenn J. Ingoglia, Island Park, for respondent.

Before: Lippman, P.J., Andrias, Nardelli, Buckley and Acosta, JJ.


Defendants failed to demonstrate their entitlement to judgment by showing that they did not have notice of the ice on the porch on which plaintiff slipped in time to remedy the situation ( see Pacheco v Fifteen Twenty Seven Assoc., 275 AD2d 282, 283-284; Simmons v Metropolitan Life Ins. Co., 207 AD2d 290, 291, affd 84 NY2d 972). Ice could have formed sufficiently in advance of the accident to place defendants on notice of the hazardous condition in time to rectify it.


Summaries of

Wallace v. Goodstein

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Feb 21, 2008
48 A.D.3d 319 (N.Y. App. Div. 2008)
Case details for

Wallace v. Goodstein

Case Details

Full title:REGINALD WALLACE, Respondent, v. GOODSTEIN MANAGEMENT, LLC, et al.…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Feb 21, 2008

Citations

48 A.D.3d 319 (N.Y. App. Div. 2008)
2008 N.Y. Slip Op. 1597
851 N.Y.S.2d 516

Citing Cases

Mayo v. Mktropolitan Opera Ass'n, Inc.

This evidence is some proof that the subject ladder remained in a potentially dangerous condition, and the…

Mayo v. Metropolitan Opera Association, Inc.

This evidence is some proof that the subject ladder remained in a potentially dangerous condition, and the…