From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Wallace v. Garrido

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
Apr 16, 2021
CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:20-CV-476 (E.D. Tex. Apr. 16, 2021)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:20-CV-476

04-16-2021

WAYNE WALLACE, Petitioner, v. F.J. GARRIDO, Respondent.


MEMORANDUM ORDER OVERRULING OBJECTIONS AND ADOPTING THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

Petitioner Wayne Wallace, proceeding pro se, filed this petition for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241. The court referred this matter to the Honorable Zack Hawthorn, United States Magistrate Judge, at Beaumont, Texas, for consideration pursuant to applicable laws and orders of this court.

The magistrate judge has submitted a Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge concerning the petition. The magistrate judge recommends dismissing the petition without prejudice for failure to exhaust administrative remedies.

The court has received the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge, along with the record, pleadings, and all available evidence. Petitioner filed objections to the Report and Recommendation. The court must therefore conduct a de novo review of the objections in light of the pleadings and the applicable law.

Petitioner states the Bureau of Prisons has failed to properly calculate and apply credits he earned by taking a course in recidivism reduction training. He contends he is entitled to credit under 18 U.S.C. § 3632(d)(4)(A). Petitioner states he should not be required to exhaust his administrative remedies because attempting to do so would be futile.

As a general matter, federal prisoners must exhaust administrative remedies before seeking habeas relief under Section 2241. Fuller v. Rich, 11 F.3d 61, 62 (5th Cir. 1994). Exceptions to the exhaustion requirement apply only in "extraordinary circumstances" when administrative remedies are unavailable or wholly inappropriate to the relief sought, or where the attempt to exhaust such remedies would itself be "a patently futile course of action." Id.

Petitioner does not contend he has completed the administrative remedy process that is available to him. While he asserts that completing the process would be futile, he provides no evidence in support of his assertion. He has failed to explain why the Bureau of Prisons would not consider his request for administrative remedy in good faith and correct any error it has made in calculating his sentence. Petitioner's objections are therefore without merit.

ORDER

Accordingly, petitioner's objections are OVERRULED. The findings of fact and conclusions of law of the magistrate judge are correct, and the report of the magistrate judge is ADOPTED. A final judgment shall be entered dismissing the petition.

SIGNED at Beaumont, Texas, this 16th day of April, 2021.

/s/_________

MARCIA A. CRONE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Wallace v. Garrido

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
Apr 16, 2021
CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:20-CV-476 (E.D. Tex. Apr. 16, 2021)
Case details for

Wallace v. Garrido

Case Details

Full title:WAYNE WALLACE, Petitioner, v. F.J. GARRIDO, Respondent.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

Date published: Apr 16, 2021

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:20-CV-476 (E.D. Tex. Apr. 16, 2021)

Citing Cases

Salter v. Fikes

The Court therefore concludes, as many other courts have when addressing similar habeas petitions, that…