From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Wallace v. Dubin

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jul 5, 2005
20 A.D.3d 412 (N.Y. App. Div. 2005)

Opinion

2004-05976.

July 5, 2005.

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (O. Bellantoni, J.), entered June 28, 2004, which denied his motion for summary judgment on the issue of liability.

John T. Wisell, Kew Gardens, N.Y., for appellant.

Boeggeman, George, Hodges Corde, P.C., White Plains, N.Y. (Leslie K. Arfine and Cynthia Dolan of counsel), for respondents Deborah Dubin and Beth Dubin.

Bivona Cohen, P.C., New York, N.Y. (Michael N. Jagiani of counsel), for respondent Bank of America Auto Finance Corporation.

Before: H. Miller, J.P., Goldstein, Crane and Skelos, JJ., concur.


Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The Supreme Court correctly denied the plaintiff's motion for summary judgment on the issue of liability. The evidence failed to establish the absence of a triable issue of fact ( see Thoma v. Ronai, 82 NY2d 736, 737). Although the submissions on the motion for summary judgment demonstrated that the defendant driver was negligent in failing to yield the right of way, the plaintiff's concession that he did not know the speed at which he was operating his motorcycle and did not recall seeing the other vehicle, together with the evidence submitted in opposition to the motion, raised questions of fact as to his freedom from negligence ( see id.; Eastmond v. Wen Po Wong, 300 AD2d 344).


Summaries of

Wallace v. Dubin

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jul 5, 2005
20 A.D.3d 412 (N.Y. App. Div. 2005)
Case details for

Wallace v. Dubin

Case Details

Full title:ERIC WALLACE, Appellant, v. DEBORAH DUBIN et al., Respondents

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Jul 5, 2005

Citations

20 A.D.3d 412 (N.Y. App. Div. 2005)
798 N.Y.S.2d 506

Citing Cases

Villa v. Leandrou

ORDERED that the order is affirmed, with costs. As properly determined by the Supreme Court, the plaintiff…

Roman v. Limousine

Although we affirm the order of the Supreme Court, we do so on different grounds from those relied upon by…