From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Wallace v. Cotton Oil Co.

Supreme Court of North Carolina
Sep 1, 1921
108 S.E. 327 (N.C. 1921)

Opinion

(Filed 14 September, 1921.)

APPEAL by defendant from Calvert, J., at January Term, 1921, of NASH.

Battle Winslow for plaintiff.

M. V. Barnhill and F. S. Spruill for defendant.


Action to recover damages for an alleged negligent injury, tried upon the usual issues of negligence, contributory negligence and damages. From a verdict and judgment in favor of plaintiff the defendant appealed.


All the defendant's exceptions and assignments of error, not abandoned in its brief, are directed exclusively to the charge. After a careful examination of the Court's charge to the jury and the defendant's exceptions thereto, we can find no prejudicial or reversible error. A perusal of the record, in its entirety, (756) leaves us with the impression that the case has been tried in substantial conformity to our decisions and we have discovered no sufficient reason for disturbing the result.

No error.


Summaries of

Wallace v. Cotton Oil Co.

Supreme Court of North Carolina
Sep 1, 1921
108 S.E. 327 (N.C. 1921)
Case details for

Wallace v. Cotton Oil Co.

Case Details

Full title:ROBERT C. WALLACE v. SOUTHERN COTTON OIL COMPANY

Court:Supreme Court of North Carolina

Date published: Sep 1, 1921

Citations

108 S.E. 327 (N.C. 1921)
182 N.C. 755

Citing Cases

McLemore McArthur v. Rogers

The appellant used such equipment and adopted such equipment as was in common and general use by persons of…