Summary
In Wallace v. Lawyer (54 Ind. 501) the court was called upon to construe a provision of the practice act of the State of Indiana authorizing proceedings supplementary to execution against any "person" or "corporation" under which proceedings were instituted to reach the salary of a judgment debtor who was a county auditor, and it was held that the provision did not refer to municipal corporations or bodies politic and corporate, but only to private or ordinary business corporations.
Summary of this case from Rosenstock v. City of New YorkOpinion
NO. 14-12-00200-CV
06-14-2012
ROBERT T. WALLACE, Appellant v. COMMISSION FOR LAWYER DISCIPLINE, Appellee
Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed June 14, 2012.
On Appeal from the 152nd District Court
Harris County, Texas
Trial Court Cause No. 2007-03987
MEMORANDUM OPINION
This appeal is from a judgment signed November 20, 2011. No clerk's record has been filed. The clerk responsible for preparing the record in this appeal informed the court appellant did not make arrangements to pay for the record.
On March 19, 2012, notification was transmitted to all parties of the court's intention to dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution unless, within fifteen days, appellant paid or made arrangements to pay for the record and provided this court with proof of payment. See Tex. R. App. P. 37.3(b). Appellant filed a motion to extend time to file the record, which this court granted. The record was due May 1, 2012. On May 10, 2012, appellant was again ordered to provide proof of payment for the record.
Appellant has not provided this court with proof of payment for the record. Accordingly, the appeal is ordered dismissed.
PER CURIAM Panel consists of Chief Justice Hedges and Justices Seymore and Brown.