Opinion
No. 33225
Decided December 10, 1952.
Supreme Court — Dismissal — No debatable constitutional question involved — Intoxicating liquor — Department of Liquor Control — Power to grant or refuse permits — Section 6064-8, General Code — Department's refusal to grant renewal permit — Premises not conducted in sanitary manner — Attempt by permittee to correct by purchase of new equipment — Permittee's failure to maintain decency, sobriety and good order — Presence of intoxicated persons on premises — Altercations permitted on premises — Appeal — Board of Liquor Control to Common Pleas Court — Court not to substitute its judgment for decision of board — Applicability of amended statute to pending proceedings — Section 26, General Code.
APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Franklin county.
Mr. Simon L. Leis, for appellant.
Mr. C. William O'Neill, attorney general, and Mr. Ralph N. Mahaffey, for appellee.
It is ordered and adjudged that this appeal as of right be, and the same hereby is, dismissed for the reason that no debatable constitutional question is involved.
Appeal dismissed.
WEYGANDT, C.J., ZIMMERMAN, STEWART, MIDDLETON, TAFT, MATTHIAS and HART, JJ., concur.