Opinion
19-CV-7413 (CM)
10-09-2019
ORDER :
Plaintiff filed this action pro se. On September 24, 2019, the Court dismissed the complaint pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(i), (iii). On September 27, 2019, and October 9, 2019, Plaintiff filed letters "requesting items for service." (ECF Nos. 10, 11.)
Because the Court dismissed Plaintiff's complaint, his requests are denied as moot.
CONCLUSION
Accordingly, Plaintiff's requests (ECF Nos. 10, 11) are denied as moot.
The Clerk of Court is directed to mail a copy of this order to Plaintiff and note service on the docket.
Plaintiff's case in this Court under ECF 1:19-CV-7413, 2 is closed. The Court will only accept for filing documents that are directed to the Second Circuit Court of Appeals. If Plaintiff files other documents that are frivolous or meritless, the Court will direct Plaintiff to show cause why Plaintiff should not be barred from filing further documents in this action.
The Clerk of Court is directed to docket this as a "written opinion" within the meaning of Section 205(a)(5) of the E-Government Act of 2002.
The Court certifies under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from this order would not be taken in good faith, and therefore in forma pauperis status is denied for the purpose of an appeal. Cf. Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 444-45 (1962) (holding that an appellant demonstrates good faith when he seeks review of a nonfrivolous issue). SO ORDERED. Dated: October 9, 2019
New York, New York
/s/_________
COLLEEN McMAHON
Chief United States District Judge