From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Wall v. Drasheff

Supreme Court of Alabama
Jul 31, 1947
31 So. 2d 598 (Ala. 1947)

Opinion

6 Div. 574.

July 31, 1947.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Jefferson County; E. M. Creel, Judge.

Jackson, Rives Pettus, of Birmingham, for appellant.

In action to have a deed absolute on its face declared a mortgage, the court may ascertain from extrinsic evidence what was in fact the real contract between the parties. McNeill v. Norsworthy, 39 Ala. 156; Morton v. Allen, 180 Ala. 279, 60 So. 866, L.R.A. 1916B, 11; Kelly v. Tatum, 224 Ala. 57, 139 So. 246.

Kingman C. Shelburne, of Birmingham, for appellee.

In order to authorize the court to treat a deed absolute on its face as a mortgage, it must appear not only that the grantor intended and considered it as a mortgage, but that the grantee intended and accepted it as a mortgage. Martin v. Martin, 123 Ala. 191, 194, 26 So. 525; Sewell v. Price, 32 Ala. 97; Mitchell v. Wellman, 80 Ala. 16, 20; Smith v. Smith, 153 Ala. 504, 511, 45 So. 168.


Appeal from interlocutory order sustaining demurrer to amended bill seeking to declare a deed a mortgage.

To convert a conveyance absolute in its terms into a mortgage, the intention and understanding of all parties to that effect must concur. The fact that the grantor intended the conveyance as a mortgage is not sufficient. The grantee must also have so intended and considered it and accepted the instrument as such. Martin v. Martin, 123 Ala. 191, 26 So. 525; West v. Hendrix, 28 Ala. 226; Sewell v. Price's Adm'r, 32 Ala. 97; Mitchell v. Wellman, 80 Ala. 16; Mobile Building Loan Ass'n v. Robertson, 65 Ala. 382; Douglass v. Moody, 80 Ala. 61.

To invoke the aid of equity to this end "there must be specific allegation that security for the debt was understood and intended by both parties to the transaction." Hogan v. Moore, 221 Ala. 355, 358, 128 So. 790, 792; Smith v. Smith, 153 Ala. 504, 45 So. 168.

The bill as amended was notably deficient in these allegational requisites and the trial court must be affirmed in sustaining the demurrer thereto.

Affirmed.

GARDNER, C. J., and BROWN and LIVINGSTON, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Wall v. Drasheff

Supreme Court of Alabama
Jul 31, 1947
31 So. 2d 598 (Ala. 1947)
Case details for

Wall v. Drasheff

Case Details

Full title:WALL v. DRASHEFF

Court:Supreme Court of Alabama

Date published: Jul 31, 1947

Citations

31 So. 2d 598 (Ala. 1947)
31 So. 2d 598

Citing Cases

Winston v. Dixon

It is not alone sufficient to show the grantor so intended, but it must be established by the requisite proof…

Cousins v. Crawford

To produce that effect such must have been the clear and certain intention and understanding of the other…