From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Wall v. Baserap

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA Richmond Division
May 7, 2012
Civil Action No. 3:12CV93 (E.D. Va. May. 7, 2012)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 3:12CV93

05-07-2012

GERALD WALL, Plaintiff, v. SGT. BASERAP, et al., Defendants.


MEMORANDUM OPINION

By Memorandum Order entered on February 24, 2012, the Court conditionally docketed the action. By that Memorandum Order the Court informed Plaintiff that he must keep the Court informed of his current address. On March 28, 2012, United States Postal Service returned the Memorandum Order entered on March 23, 2012 marked, "Gone" and "RTS." Since that date, Plaintiff has not contacted the Court provide a current address. Plaintiff's failure to contact the Court and provide a current address indicates his lack of interest in prosecuting this action. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b). Accordingly, the action will be DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE.

An appropriate Order shall accompany this Memorandum Opinion.

_______________

John A. Gibney, Jr.

United States District Judge
Richmond, Virginia


Summaries of

Wall v. Baserap

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA Richmond Division
May 7, 2012
Civil Action No. 3:12CV93 (E.D. Va. May. 7, 2012)
Case details for

Wall v. Baserap

Case Details

Full title:GERALD WALL, Plaintiff, v. SGT. BASERAP, et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA Richmond Division

Date published: May 7, 2012

Citations

Civil Action No. 3:12CV93 (E.D. Va. May. 7, 2012)