From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Walkup v. United States

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF KENTUCKY BOWLING GREEN DIVISION
Nov 15, 2016
CRIMINAL ACTION NO. 1:09-CR-00026-TBR-HBB-23 (W.D. Ky. Nov. 15, 2016)

Opinion

CRIMINAL ACTION NO. 1:09-CR-00026-TBR-HBB-23

11-15-2016

BRICESON WALKUP MOVANT/DEFENDANT v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA RESPONDENT/PLAINTIFF

cc: Briceson Walkup, pro se plaintiff # 12051-033 Federal Correctional Inst. P.O. Box 350 Beaver, WV 25813 and Counsel


OPINION AND ORDER

This matter is before the Court on Movant/Defendant Briceson Walkup's pro se Motion to Vacate his sentence pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255 [DN 1518] and the Magistrate Judge's Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law and Recommendation in which he recommends that the Motion to Vacate be denied. [DN 1527.] The Movant/Defendant filed no objections to the Magistrate Judge's report, and the time to do so has passed.

Generally, the Court must make a de novo determination of those portions of a Magistrate Judge's recommended disposition to which objections are filed. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(c). However, when no objections are entered, the Court need not "review . . . a magistrate's factual or legal conclusions, under a de novo or any other standard." Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 150 (1985). Furthermore, parties who fail to object to a Magistrate Judge's report and recommendation are barred from appealing a district court's order adopting that report and recommendation. United States v. Walters, 638 F.2d 947 (6th Cir.1981).

These principles notwithstanding, the Court has examined the record and the Magistrate Judge's recommended disposition and agrees that the Magistrate Judge's analysis is sound. Therefore, the Court being sufficiently advised, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED AND ADJUDGED as follows:

1. The Court ADOPTS the Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law as set forth in the report submitted by the United States Magistrate Judge. [DN 1527.]

2. Movant/Defendant's Motion to Vacate under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 [DN 1518] is DENIED.

3. A Certificate of Appealability is DENIED as to all claims asserted in Movant/Defendant's Motion to Vacate.

This is a final judgment, and the matter is hereby stricken from the active Docket of the Court.

/s/

Thomas B. Russell, Senior Judge

United States District Court

November 15, 2016 cc: Briceson Walkup, pro se plaintiff
# 12051-033
Federal Correctional Inst.
P.O. Box 350
Beaver, WV 25813 and Counsel


Summaries of

Walkup v. United States

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF KENTUCKY BOWLING GREEN DIVISION
Nov 15, 2016
CRIMINAL ACTION NO. 1:09-CR-00026-TBR-HBB-23 (W.D. Ky. Nov. 15, 2016)
Case details for

Walkup v. United States

Case Details

Full title:BRICESON WALKUP MOVANT/DEFENDANT v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF KENTUCKY BOWLING GREEN DIVISION

Date published: Nov 15, 2016

Citations

CRIMINAL ACTION NO. 1:09-CR-00026-TBR-HBB-23 (W.D. Ky. Nov. 15, 2016)

Citing Cases

Johnson v. White

(D.N. 10, PageID # 40; D.N. 23) Both White and Johnson filed objections to the report and recommendation.…