From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Walkovszky v. Carlton

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Nov 27, 1968
244 N.E.2d 55 (N.Y. 1968)

Opinion

Argued November 13, 1968

Decided November 27, 1968

Appeal from the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the Second Judicial Department, RICHARD F. DALY, J.

Norbert Ruttenberg and Marshall M. Kolba for appellant.

Lawrence Lauer for respondent.


Order affirmed, with costs, in the following memorandum: The complaint before us — amended following our decision when the case was previously here ( 18 N.Y.2d 414) — now meets the pleading requirements set forth in the court's opinion and states a valid cause of action. It is hardly necessary to add that we pass only upon the sufficiency of the complaint and that it will be incumbent upon the plaintiff, if he is to succeed, to prove upon the trial the truth and correctness of his allegations. Question certified answered in the affirmative.

Concur: Chief Judge FULD and Judges BURKE, SCILEPPI, BERGAN, KEATING, BREITEL and JASEN.


Summaries of

Walkovszky v. Carlton

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Nov 27, 1968
244 N.E.2d 55 (N.Y. 1968)
Case details for

Walkovszky v. Carlton

Case Details

Full title:JOHN WALKOVSZKY, Respondent, v. WILLIAM CARLTON, Appellant, et al.…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Nov 27, 1968

Citations

244 N.E.2d 55 (N.Y. 1968)
244 N.E.2d 55
296 N.Y.S.2d 362

Citing Cases

Menaker v. Alstaedter

However, paragraph 22 of the complaint alleges a violation of Debtor and Creditor Law § 276 which, insofar as…

In re Teleservices Group, Inc.

Quite the contrary, a corporation may be financed on debt; and public policy encourages this, for a minimum…