From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Walkingstick v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas, Thirteenth District, Corpus Christi-Edinburg
Jul 28, 2022
No. 13-22-00290-CR (Tex. App. Jul. 28, 2022)

Opinion

13-22-00290-CR

07-28-2022

PRESTON MCKAIG WALKINGSTICK, Appellant, v. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee.


Do not publish. TEX. R. APP. P. 47.2(b).

On appeal from the 377th District Court of Victoria County, Texas.

Before Chief Justice Contreras and Justices Longoria and Tijerina

MEMORANDUM OPINION

JAIME TIJERINA JUSTICE

This cause is before the Court on appellant's waiver of appeal which is now construed as a motion to dismiss this appeal. The motion was signed by both counsel and the appellant. We find the motion meets the requirement of Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 42.2(a) that appellant and attorney must sign a written motion to dismiss the appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.2(a). Without passing on the merits of the case, the motion to dismiss is granted.

Accordingly, the appeal is hereby dismissed. Having dismissed the appeal at appellant's request, no motion for rehearing will be entertained.


Summaries of

Walkingstick v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas, Thirteenth District, Corpus Christi-Edinburg
Jul 28, 2022
No. 13-22-00290-CR (Tex. App. Jul. 28, 2022)
Case details for

Walkingstick v. State

Case Details

Full title:PRESTON MCKAIG WALKINGSTICK, Appellant, v. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee.

Court:Court of Appeals of Texas, Thirteenth District, Corpus Christi-Edinburg

Date published: Jul 28, 2022

Citations

No. 13-22-00290-CR (Tex. App. Jul. 28, 2022)