From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Walker v. Winters

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Dec 1, 1906
116 App. Div. 921 (N.Y. App. Div. 1906)

Opinion

December, 1906.


Judgment and order affirmed, with costs. All concurred, except Spring, J., who dissented on the ground that exceptions to the charge and to the reception of evidence present reversible errors, particularly in the charge that the defendants were required to use the best mechanical appliances and contrivances known in that locality, designed to prevent the escape of sparks and live coals.


Summaries of

Walker v. Winters

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Dec 1, 1906
116 App. Div. 921 (N.Y. App. Div. 1906)
Case details for

Walker v. Winters

Case Details

Full title:Fred Walker and Others, Respondents, v. Edward Winters and Gillis Winters…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Dec 1, 1906

Citations

116 App. Div. 921 (N.Y. App. Div. 1906)
101 N.Y.S. 1148