From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Walker v. Vazquez

United States District Court, E.D. California
Apr 13, 2007
1:05-cv-00709-LJO-NEW-P (E.D. Cal. Apr. 13, 2007)

Opinion

1:05-cv-00709-LJO-NEW-P.

April 13, 2007


ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS (Doc. 25) ORDER DENYING MOTIONS FOR TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER (Docs. 19 21)


Harold Walker ("Plaintiff"), a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 72-302.

On February 21, 2007, Magistrate Judge Dennis L. Beck filedFidings and Recommendations herein which were served on the parties and which contained notice to the parties that any objections to the Findings and Recommendations were to be filed within thirty (30) days. To date, the parties have not filed objections to the Magistrate Judge's Findings and Recommendations.

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 73-305, this Court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the Court finds the Findings and Recommendations to be supported by the record and by proper analysis.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The Findings and Recommendations, filed February 21, 2007, are ADOPTED IN FULL; and,

2. Plaintiff's Motions for Temporary Restraining Order, filed February 13, 2007 and February 16, 2007, are DENIED.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Walker v. Vazquez

United States District Court, E.D. California
Apr 13, 2007
1:05-cv-00709-LJO-NEW-P (E.D. Cal. Apr. 13, 2007)
Case details for

Walker v. Vazquez

Case Details

Full title:HAROLD WALKER, Plaintiff, v. VAZQUEZ, et al., Defendants

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Apr 13, 2007

Citations

1:05-cv-00709-LJO-NEW-P (E.D. Cal. Apr. 13, 2007)