From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Walker v. Transportation International Movers, Inc.

United States District Court, D. Oregon
Oct 30, 2007
Civil No. 06-3030-CL (D. Or. Oct. 30, 2007)

Opinion

Civil No. 06-3030-CL.

October 30, 2007


ORDER


On October 3, 2007, Magistrate Judge Clarke filed his Report and Recommendation (docket # 69), which recommended that this court deny the motion (# 36) by Defendants Transportation International Movers, Inc., Transportation International, Inc., and J.P. Martin, for leave to amend their answer to add self-defense as an affirmative defense. Defendants timely objected to that recommendation.

The matter is now before me for de novo review pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Fed.R.Civ.P. 72(b). Having considered the Report and the parties' submissions, I find no error.

Conclusion

Magistrate Judge Clarke's Report and Recommendation (# 69) is adopted. Defendants' motion (# 36) for leave to file an amended answer is denied.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Walker v. Transportation International Movers, Inc.

United States District Court, D. Oregon
Oct 30, 2007
Civil No. 06-3030-CL (D. Or. Oct. 30, 2007)
Case details for

Walker v. Transportation International Movers, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:JAMES R. WALKER, Plaintiff, v. TRANSPORTATION INTERNATIONAL MOVERS, INC.…

Court:United States District Court, D. Oregon

Date published: Oct 30, 2007

Citations

Civil No. 06-3030-CL (D. Or. Oct. 30, 2007)