From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Walker v. Tonks

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Feb 20, 2001
4 F. App'x 425 (9th Cir. 2001)

Opinion


4 Fed.Appx. 425 (9th Cir. 2001) Robert Evans WALKER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Michael J. TONKS, Defendant-Appellee. No. 99-56055. D.C. No. CV-98-00945-CBM-CTx. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. February 20, 2001

Submitted February 9, 2001.

The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

NOT FOR PUBLICATION. (See Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure Rule 36-3)

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California, Consuelo B. Marshall, District Judge, Presiding.

Before LEAVY, TROTT, and SILVERMAN, Circuit Judges.

ORDER

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as may be provided in Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

This appeal is dismissed for failure to prosecute pursuant to Ninth Circuit Rule 42-1. Appellant Walker did not return an acknowledgment of oral argument, nor did he appear at oral argument, which was scheduled for February 9, 2001. The appeal is accordingly DISMISSED.


Summaries of

Walker v. Tonks

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Feb 20, 2001
4 F. App'x 425 (9th Cir. 2001)
Case details for

Walker v. Tonks

Case Details

Full title:Robert Evans WALKER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Michael J. TONKS…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit

Date published: Feb 20, 2001

Citations

4 F. App'x 425 (9th Cir. 2001)