From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Walker v. Tippecanoe County Commissioners

United States District Court, N.D. Indiana, South Bend Division
Aug 7, 2007
CAUSE NO. 3:06-CV-742 PS (N.D. Ind. Aug. 7, 2007)

Opinion

CAUSE NO. 3:06-CV-742 PS.

August 7, 2007


REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION


On July 12, 2007, James Walker, a pro se prisoner, was ordered to show cause why this case should not be dismissed without prejudice pursuant to FED. R. CIV. P. 41(b) because he has not kept the court appraised of his current address. That order stated that without a usable address, the court is unable to contact him and this lawsuit cannot continue. That order was returned, undeliverable. The deadline for responding to that order has now passed. Therefore the Court RECOMMENDS that this case be dismissed without prejudice for want of prosecution and for failure to comply with an order of this court pursuant to FED. R. CIV. P. 41(b).

NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that within ten (10) days after being served with a copy of this recommended disposition a party may serve and file specific, written objections to the proposed findings and/or recommendations. FED. R. CIV. P. 72(b). FAILURE TO FILE OBJECTIONS WITHIN THE SPECIFIED TIME WAIVES THE RIGHT TO APPEAL THE DISTRICT COURT'S ORDER. See Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140 (1985); Lerro v. Quaker Oats Co., 84 F.3d 239 (7th Cir. 1996); Lockert v. Faulkner, 843 F.2d 1015 (7th Cir. 1988); Video Views, Inc. v. Studio 21 Ltd., 797 F.2d 538 (7th Cir. 1986).

SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Walker v. Tippecanoe County Commissioners

United States District Court, N.D. Indiana, South Bend Division
Aug 7, 2007
CAUSE NO. 3:06-CV-742 PS (N.D. Ind. Aug. 7, 2007)
Case details for

Walker v. Tippecanoe County Commissioners

Case Details

Full title:JAMES WALKER, Plaintiff, v. TIPPECANOE COUNTY COMMISSIONERS, et al.…

Court:United States District Court, N.D. Indiana, South Bend Division

Date published: Aug 7, 2007

Citations

CAUSE NO. 3:06-CV-742 PS (N.D. Ind. Aug. 7, 2007)