Opinion
No. CIV 09-0060 JB/KBM.
July 18, 2011
Katherine E. Murray, Santa Fe, New Mexico and Daniel Yohalem, Richard Rosenstock, Santa Fe, New Mexico, Attorneys for the Plaintiffs.
Danny Jarrett, Trent A. Howell, Jackson Lewis, LLP, Albuquerque, New Mexico and Lori D. Proctor, Johnson, Trent, West Taylor, LLP, Houston, Texas, Attorneys for Defendants THI of New Mexico at Hobbs Center, LLC and THI of New Mexico, LLC.
Barbara G. Stephenson, Quentin Smith, Sheehan Sheehan, P.A., Albuquerque, New Mexico, Attorneys for Defendants Fundamental Administrative Services, LLC, Karen Hood (Miller), Debbie Lothridge, and Diana Melton.
John A. Bannerman, Margaret A. Graham, Bannerman Johnson, P.A., Albuquerque, New Mexico, Attorneys for Defendants Jaime Andujo and Fundamental Clinical Consulting, LLC.
Colin T. Cameron, Rubin, Katz Law Firm, Santa Fe, New Mexico and Rick L. Brunner, Columbus, Ohio, Attorneys for Defendants Diana Melton, Jaime Andujo, Debbie Lothridge, and Karen Hood (Miller).
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
THIS MATTER comes before the Court on the Defendants' Motion for Reconsideration, filed May 24, 2011 (Doc. 302). The Court held a hearing on July 15, 2011. At the hearing, Defendants THI of New Mexico at Hobbs Center, LLC ("THI of Hobbs"), Fundamental Administrative Services, LLC ("FAS"), and Fundamental Clinical Consulting, LLC ("FCC") represented that they will comply with the Court's Memorandum Opinion and Order, filed July 4, 2011 (Doc. 340), and that they withdraw the motion for reconsideration. The Court stated that it would enter an order indicating that the motion for reconsideration has been withdrawn and that the parties will comply with the Court's Memorandum Opinion and Order. The Court orders that the Defendants produce documents consistent with the Court's July 4, 2011 MOO which required the production of documents for the entire period of Walker's employment and without regard to whether the documents were generated by the Defendants or entities owned by the Defendants; the standard will be whether the documents are in the Defendants' possession, custody, or control. The Defendants must produce these documents by 5:00 p.m. on August 1, 2011. Because THI of Hobbs, FAS, and FCC indicated that they would withdraw the motion to reconsider, the Court deems the motion to reconsider withdrawn.
IT IS ORDERED that the Defendants' Motion for Reconsideration, filed May 24, 2011 (Doc. 302), is withdrawn.