From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Walker v. Target Corp.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT Northern District of California
Oct 19, 2011
No. CV11-02368 MEJ (N.D. Cal. Oct. 19, 2011)

Opinion

No. CV11-02368 MEJ

10-19-2011

TENNIEL WALKER, Plaintiff, v. TARGET CORPORATION, Defendant.


ORDER DIRECTING PARTIES TO MEET AND CONFER

The Court is in receipt of Defendant's letter regarding Plaintiff's failure to comply with discovery obligations in this case. Dkt. No. 13. The parties are hereby ORDERED to meet and confer in compliance with the undersigned's Discovery Standing Order. Plaintiff's counsel, Lawrence Allan Moy, shall contact Defendant's counsel, Gail C. Trabish, by October 21, 2011 at 10:00 a.m. and provide at least three (3) dates and times at which he is able to meet during normal business hours (9 a.m. through 5 p.m.) before November 2, 2011. Defendant's counsel shall choose the date on which the parties will meet. Failure to comply with this Order, as well as Plaintiff's failure to comply with his other discovery obligations, may result in the impositions of sanctions.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Maria-Elen James

Chief United States Magistrate Judge


Summaries of

Walker v. Target Corp.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT Northern District of California
Oct 19, 2011
No. CV11-02368 MEJ (N.D. Cal. Oct. 19, 2011)
Case details for

Walker v. Target Corp.

Case Details

Full title:TENNIEL WALKER, Plaintiff, v. TARGET CORPORATION, Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT Northern District of California

Date published: Oct 19, 2011

Citations

No. CV11-02368 MEJ (N.D. Cal. Oct. 19, 2011)