From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Walker v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
Nov 22, 1989
552 So. 2d 333 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1989)

Opinion

No. 87-2644.

November 22, 1989.

Appeal from the Circuit Court, Palm Beach County, Harold J. Cohen, J.

Max Rudmann, Boca Raton, for appellant.

Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., and Bradley R. Bischoff, Asst. Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, for appellee.


We affirm appellant's conviction and conclude he knowingly waived his right to effect recusal. The trial court, having announced its friendship with the judge who was the object of the defendant's solicitation to commit premeditated murder, on more than one occasion suggested that the defendant and his counsel consider appropriate motions for recusal or change of venue, if so disposed. No such motion was forthcoming.

Without suggesting any criticism in this case, we believe the appearance of justice could be enhanced if, when we judges are not going to recuse ourselves sua sponte, we affirm on the record our confidence in our ability to be even handed in that particular case.

GLICKSTEIN and WALDEN, JJ., concur.

DELL, J., concurs in result only.


Summaries of

Walker v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
Nov 22, 1989
552 So. 2d 333 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1989)
Case details for

Walker v. State

Case Details

Full title:RALPH WALKER, APPELLANT, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District

Date published: Nov 22, 1989

Citations

552 So. 2d 333 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1989)

Citing Cases

Bay Bank Trust Co. v. Lewis

Although a petition for writ of prohibition is an original proceeding in the purest sense, its purpose in the…