From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Walker v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Oct 20, 1999
742 So. 2d 533 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1999)

Opinion

No. 99-1147.

Opinion filed October 20, 1999.

An appeal under Fla.R.App.P. 9.140(i) from the Circuit Court for Dade County, Manuel Crespo, Judge, L.T. No. 80-21484.

Lonnie Walker, in proper person.

Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General and Darien M. Doe, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.

Before JORGENSON, GERSTEN, and GREEN, JJ.


The appellant appeals the denial of his postconviction relief motion. We affirm the trial court's denial of the motion as the record reflects that it is both successive and time barred. We note that this motion is only the latest in a long series of repetitive postconviction motions filed over a twenty year time period, all of which have repeatedly been rejected by the courts.

For this reason and pursuant to State v. Spencer, 24 Fla. L. Weekly S433 (Fla. Sept. 23, 1999), we are remanding this cause to the trial court for it to issue a show cause order to the appellant as to why he should not be barred from filing further pro se postconviction motions attacking his convictions and sentences. The trial court shall give the appellant adequate time to file his written response thereto. Upon receipt of the appellant's response, if he elects to so respond, the trial court is directed to make written findings on the show cause order accordingly.

Affirmed with directions.


Summaries of

Walker v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Oct 20, 1999
742 So. 2d 533 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1999)
Case details for

Walker v. State

Case Details

Full title:LONNIE WALKER, Appellant, v. THE STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District

Date published: Oct 20, 1999

Citations

742 So. 2d 533 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1999)

Citing Cases

Walker v. State

In addition, the defendant's multiple successive motions for post-conviction relief were all denied by the…