Opinion
No. 14-04-00802-CR
Memorandum Opinion filed July 14, 2005. DO NOT PUBLISH. Tex.R.App.P. 47.2(b).
On Appeal from the 230th District Court Harris County, Texas, Trial Court Cause No. 976,559. Affirmed.
Panel consists of Chief Justice HEDGES and Justices FOWLER and FROST.
MEMORANDUM OPINION
After a jury trial, appellant was convicted of the offense of assault on a public servant On August 3, 2004, the trial court sentenced appellant to confinement for twenty-five years in the Institutional Division of the Texas Department of Criminal Justice. Appellant filed a timely, written notice of appeal. Appellant's appointed counsel filed a brief in which she concludes the appeal is wholly frivolous and without merit. The brief meets the requirements of Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396 (1967), by presenting a professional evaluation of the record and demonstrating why there are no arguable grounds to be advanced. See High v. State, 573 S.W.2d 807 (Tex.Crim.App. 1978). A copy of counsel's brief was delivered to appellant. Appellant was advised of the right to examine the appellate record and file a pro se response. See Stafford v. State, 813 S.W.2d 503, 510 (Tex.Crim.App. 1991). By order of this court, appellant was furnished a copy of the record on May 13, 2005. Appellant was advised that any response to counsel's Anders brief was due on or before June 13, 2005. As of this date, no pro se response has been filed. We have carefully reviewed the record and counsel's brief and agree the appeal is wholly frivolous and without merit. Further, we find no reversible error in the record. A discussion of the brief would add nothing to the jurisprudence of the state. Accordingly, the judgment of the trial court is affirmed.