Opinion
Nos. 05-08-01219-CR, 05-08-01220-CR, 05-08-01221-CR
Opinion issued July 28, 2009. DO NOT PUBLISH. Tex. R. App. P. 47
On Appeal from the 199th Judicial District Court, Collin County, Texas, Trial Court Cause Nos. 199-80354-08, 199-80355-08, 199-80356-08.
Before Justices WRIGHT, BRIDGES, and FRANCIS.
MEMORANDUM OPINION
A jury convicted Bryan Scott Walker of delivery of cocaine in an amount of four grams or more, but less than 200 grams, and two deliveries of marijuana in an amount of five pounds or less, but more than one-fourth ounce. See Tex. Health Safety Code Ann. §§ 481.112(a), (d), 481.120(b)(3) (Vernon 2003). The jury assessed punishment at seven years imprisonment, probated for ten years, for the delivery of cocaine conviction, and two years confinement in a state jail facility for each delivery of marijuana conviction. On appeal, appellant's attorney filed a brief in which he concludes the appeals are wholly frivolous and without merit. The brief meets the requirements of Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). The brief presents a professional evaluation of the record showing why, in effect, there are no arguable grounds to advance. See High v. State, 573 S.W.2d 807, 811 (Tex.Crim.App. [Panel Op.] 1978). Counsel delivered a copy of the brief to appellant. We advised appellant of his right to file a pro se response, but he did not file a pro se response. We have reviewed the record and counsel's brief. See Bledsoe v. State, 178 S.W.3d 824 (Tex.Crim.App. 2005). We agree the appeals are frivolous and without merit. We find nothing in the record that might arguably support the appeals. We affirm the trial court's judgment in each case.