From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Walker v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.
Jan 28, 2013
105 So. 3d 550 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2013)

Opinion

No. 5D12–2748.

2013-01-28

Octavius WALKER, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

3.800 Appeal from the Circuit Court for Orange County, Julie H. O'Kane, Judge. Octavius Walker, Arcadia, pro se. No Appearance for Appellee.


3.800 Appeal from the Circuit Court for Orange County, Julie H. O'Kane, Judge.
Octavius Walker, Arcadia, pro se. No Appearance for Appellee.
PER CURIAM.

We affirm the trial court's order denying Walker's rule 3.800(a) motion without prejudice to Walker filing a rule 3.800(a) motion that affirmatively demonstrates on the face of the record his entitlement to additional credit. See Woody v. State, 993 So.2d 1158 (Fla. 4th DCA 2008).

AFFIRMED.

GRIFFIN, EVANDER and JACOBUS, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Walker v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.
Jan 28, 2013
105 So. 3d 550 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2013)
Case details for

Walker v. State

Case Details

Full title:Octavius WALKER, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Date published: Jan 28, 2013

Citations

105 So. 3d 550 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2013)