From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Walker v. State

Supreme Court of Arkansas
Oct 3, 2002
85 S.W.3d 919 (Ark. 2002)

Opinion

CR 02-955

Opinion Delivered October 3, 2002

APPEAL ERROR — MOTION FOR RULE ON CLERK — GOOD CAUSE FOR GRANTING. — An admission by an attorney for a criminal defendant that the record was tendered late due to a mistake on his part is good cause to grant a motion for rule on the clerk.

Motion for Rule on the Clerk; granted.

Robert L. Scull, for appellant.

No response.


Antonio DeWayne Walker, by his attorney, has filed a motion for rule on the clerk. His attorney, Robert L. Scull, admits in his motion that the record was tendered more than seven months beyond date of the original judgment due to a mistake on his part.

The notice of appeal was not filed before entry of the original judgment. Thus, the notice of appeal would not be treated as filed on the day after judgment is entered pursuant to Ark. R.App.P. — Crim. 2(b)(1) (2002).

We find that such an error, admittedly made by the attorney for a criminal defendant, is good cause to grant the motion. See In Re: Belated Appeals in Criminal Cases, 265 Ark. 964 (1979) (per curiam).

The motion for rule on the clerk is, therefore, granted. A copy of this opinion will be forwarded to the Committee on Professional Conduct.


Summaries of

Walker v. State

Supreme Court of Arkansas
Oct 3, 2002
85 S.W.3d 919 (Ark. 2002)
Case details for

Walker v. State

Case Details

Full title:Antonio Dewayne WALKER, Appellant v. STATE of Arkansas, Appellee

Court:Supreme Court of Arkansas

Date published: Oct 3, 2002

Citations

85 S.W.3d 919 (Ark. 2002)
85 S.W.3d 919

Citing Cases

Colvin v. State

The State also argues that appellant did not overcome the presumption of proper police conduct. In light of…