" Boggs v. State, 194 Ga. App. 264 ( 390 S.E.2d 423). "`(W)hen the prosecution seeks to justify a warrantless search by proof of voluntary consent, it is not limited to proof that consent was given by the defendant, but may show that permission to search was obtained from a third party who possessed common authority over or other sufficient relationship to the premises or effects sought to be inspected. . . .' United States v. Matlock, 415 U.S. 164, 171 ( 94 SC 988, 39 L.Ed.2d 242, 249-250) (1974). Accord Walker v. State, 179 Ga. App. 782 ( 347 S.E.2d 711) (1986); Wilson v. State, 179 Ga. App. 780 ( 347 S.E.2d 709) (1986)." Pupo v. State, 187 Ga. App. 765, 767 (5) ( 371 S.E.2d 219).
United States v. Matlock, 415 U.S. 164, 171 ( 94 SC 988, 39 L.Ed.2d 242, 249-250) (1974). Accord Walker v. State, 179 Ga. App. 782 ( 347 S.E.2d 711) (1986); Wilson v. State, 179 Ga. App. 780 ( 347 S.E.2d 709) (1986). 6. Based on the foregoing, we hold that the trial court did not err in refusing to suppress as evidence the contraband seized from the vehicle, with the result that the evidence was sufficient to enable a rational trier of fact to find the appellants guilty of trafficking in cocaine beyond a reasonable doubt.
Accordingly, the trial court did not err in refusing to give defendant's request to charge on this issue. Shirley v. State, 245 Ga. 616, 619 ( 266 S.E.2d 218); Walker v. State, 179 Ga. App. 782, 784 (4) ( 347 S.E.2d 711). 4.