From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Walker v. Silver Gold Realty Corp.

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department
Mar 14, 1928
131 Misc. 598 (N.Y. App. Term 1928)

Opinion

March 14, 1928.

Appeal from the Municipal Court, Borough of Manhattan, Seventh District.

Samuel Robert Weltz, for the appellant.

Charles Marks, for the respondent.


It was entirely proper for the trial court to resubmit the case to the jury so that its verdict should correspond in form as well as in substance to the court's instructions. ( Rogan v. Mullins, 22 A.D. 117; Rippley v. Frazer, 69 Misc. 415. )

Order reversed, with thirty dollars costs, and verdict reinstated.

All concur; present, BIJUR, LEVY and CRAIN, JJ.


Summaries of

Walker v. Silver Gold Realty Corp.

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department
Mar 14, 1928
131 Misc. 598 (N.Y. App. Term 1928)
Case details for

Walker v. Silver Gold Realty Corp.

Case Details

Full title:MICHAEL WALKER, Respondent, v. SILVER AND GOLD REALTY CORPORATION…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department

Date published: Mar 14, 1928

Citations

131 Misc. 598 (N.Y. App. Term 1928)
227 N.Y.S. 568