Opinion
Civil Action 21-660
03-04-2024
SHAWN T. WALKER, Plaintiff v. PAMELA SELLERS, et al., Defendants
ORDER
GENE E.K. PRATTER UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
AND NOW, this 4th day of March, 2024, upon consideration of the defendants' Motion to Dismiss (Doc. No. 33), Mr. Walker's Opposition (Doc, No. 36), and for the reasons set forth in the accompanying memorandum, it is hereby ORDERED that:
1. The Motion (Doc. No. 33) is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART.
2. The Motion is DENIED as to Mr. Walker's retaliation claims against Ms. Sellers and Mr. Peters.
3. The Motion is GRANTED as to Mr, Walker's retaliation claim against Ms. Clark. The retaliation claim against Ms, Clark is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE
4, The Motion is GRANTED as to Mr, Walker's due process claims. The due process claim against all defendants is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.