From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Walker v. Sanders

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA
Aug 13, 2014
CIVIL ACTION NO.: 13-00305-BAJ-RLB (M.D. La. Aug. 13, 2014)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO.: 13-00305-BAJ-RLB

08-13-2014

CALVIN WALKER v. JOHN SANDERS, ET AL.


RULING AND ORDER

On July 14, 2014, the United States Magistrate Judge issued a Report and Recommendation, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), recommending that Plaintiff Calvin Walkers claims asserted against Defendant Unknown Adams be dismissed, without prejudice, for failure of the Plaintiff to serve this defendant within 120 days, as mandated by Rule 4(m) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. The Magistrate Judge also recommended that Defendant John Sanders's Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. 21) be granted, dismissing Plaintiff's claims, with prejudice, and that this action be dismissed. (Doc. 23.) Plaintiff asserts that the Defendants violated his constitutional rights by subjecting him to excessive force on July 21, 2012. Plaintiff also asserts that the Defendants were deliberately indifferent to his medical needs.

The Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation specifically notified the parties that, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), they had fourteen (14) days from the date they received the Report and Recommendation to file written objections to the proposed findings of fact, conclusions of law, and recommendations therein. (Doc. 23, at 1.) A review of the record indicates that neither party had filed an objection to the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation by the applicable filing deadline.

Having carefully considered the Magistrate Judge's Report, the record, and the applicable law, the Court concludes that the Magistrate Judge's Report is correct, and hereby adopts its findings of fact, conclusions of law, and recommendation.

Accordingly.

IT IS ORDERED that the Magistrate Judge's Report (Doc. 23) is ADOPTED as the Court's opinion herein.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff Calvin Walker's claims asserted against Defendant Unknown Adams are DISMISSED, without prejudice, for failure of the Plaintiff to serve this defendant within 120 days, as mandated by Rule 4(m) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendant John Sanders's Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. 21) is GRANTED.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the above captioned matter is DISMISSED, with prejudice.

Baton Rouge, Louisiana, this 13th day of August, 2014.

/s/_________

BRIAN A. JACKSON, CHIEF JUDGE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

MIDDLE DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA


Summaries of

Walker v. Sanders

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA
Aug 13, 2014
CIVIL ACTION NO.: 13-00305-BAJ-RLB (M.D. La. Aug. 13, 2014)
Case details for

Walker v. Sanders

Case Details

Full title:CALVIN WALKER v. JOHN SANDERS, ET AL.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA

Date published: Aug 13, 2014

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO.: 13-00305-BAJ-RLB (M.D. La. Aug. 13, 2014)