From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Walker v. Rivera

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
Mar 1, 2012
468 F. App'x 341 (4th Cir. 2012)

Opinion

No. 11-7425

03-01-2012

CHARLES W. WALKER, SR., Petitioner - Appellant, v. MILDRED RIVERA, Warden FCI Estill, Respondent - Appellee.

Charles W. Walker, Sr., Appellant Pro Se. Robert Frank Daley, Jr., Assistant United States Attorney, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellee.


UNPUBLISHED

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Columbia. Richard M. Gergel, District Judge. (3:10-cv-02464-RMG) Before SHEDD, AGEE, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Charles W. Walker, Sr., Appellant Pro Se. Robert Frank Daley, Jr., Assistant United States Attorney, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Charles W. Walker, Sr. appeals the district court's order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C.A. § 2241 (West 2006 & Supp. 2011) petition. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Walker v. Rivera, No. 3:10-cv-02464-RMG (D.S.C. filed Sept. 26, 2011; entered Sept. 27, 2011). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED


Summaries of

Walker v. Rivera

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
Mar 1, 2012
468 F. App'x 341 (4th Cir. 2012)
Case details for

Walker v. Rivera

Case Details

Full title:CHARLES W. WALKER, SR., Petitioner - Appellant, v. MILDRED RIVERA, Warden…

Court:UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

Date published: Mar 1, 2012

Citations

468 F. App'x 341 (4th Cir. 2012)

Citing Cases

Robinson v. Phelps

See United States v. Norman, No. CR 7:17-527-HMH, 2020 WL 4043648, at *8 (D.S.C. July 17, 2020) (finding a…

Priester v. Briggs

An error is harmless on collateral review unless it had a “substantial and injurious effect” on the…