From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Walker v. Priest

Supreme Court of Arkansas
Sep 22, 2000
26 S.W.3d 785 (Ark. 2000)

Opinion

00-1037

Opinion delivered September 22, 2000

Appeal error — motion to intervene for expedited scheduling order — granted. — Where the complaint sought an order enjoining respondent from placing on the November 7, 2000 General Election ballot a proposed initiated act; where some twelve days later petitioners filed an amended complaint and a motion for an expedited scheduling order and hearing; and where on that same day the members of a coalition filed a motion to intervene, both individually and on behalf of the coalition, alleging that the coalition had been the primary proponent of the proposed act, the coalition's motion to intervene and the motion for an expedited scheduling order and hearing were granted by the supreme court.

Motion to Intervene; Motion for Expedited Scheduling Order Hearing; granted.

Rickey Hicks, R.C. "Bill" Lewellen, Herschel W. Cleveland, and Michael D. Booker, for petitioners.

No response. Williams Anderson, LLP, by: W. Jackson Williams, Peter G. Kumpe Jess Askew, III, for intervenor Chart.


On September 8, 2000, an original action was filed in this court pursuant to Amendment 7 of the Arkansas Constitution. The complaint seeks an order from this court enjoining the Respondent from placing on the November 7, 2000 General Election ballot a proposed initiated act entitled, "The Tobacco Settlement Proceeds Act." On September 19, 2000, James Lane filed a petition to intervene alleging that the petitioners in this original action had not obtained service of process upon respondent and had not sought an expedited hearing. On September 20, 2000, the petitioners filed an amended complaint and a motion for an expedited scheduling order and hearing. This same date, Arkansas Children's Hospital, Arkansas Hospital Association, Governor Mike Huckabee, University of Arkansas, Arkansas State University, American Cancer Society, American Heart Association, Arkansas for Drug Free Youth, Hispanic Health Program, Campaign for Tobacco Free Kids and National Black Leadership Initiative on Cancer, individually and as members of the Coalition for a Healthy Arkansas Today ("CHART"), filed a motion to intervene alleging that CHART has been the primary proponent of the proposed act. This court granted the intervention by Mr. Lane on September 21, 2000. According to a return on service of process that was filed on September 21, 2000, the respondent has been served with copies of the complaint and amended complaint.

[1] The motion to intervene by CHART and the motion for an expedited scheduling order and hearing are hereby granted. The schedule will be as follows: Answers will be filed by September 29, 2000. Simultaneous briefs from all parties, including the intervenors, will be filed by October 6, 2000. Simultaneous reply briefs from all parties, including the intervenors, will be filed by October 10, 2000. Oral argument will be held October 12, 2000, at 9:00 a.m.


Summaries of

Walker v. Priest

Supreme Court of Arkansas
Sep 22, 2000
26 S.W.3d 785 (Ark. 2000)
Case details for

Walker v. Priest

Case Details

Full title:WILLIAM L. "BILL" WALKER, R.C. "BILL" LEWELLEN, JEAN EDWARDS, JOHN…

Court:Supreme Court of Arkansas

Date published: Sep 22, 2000

Citations

26 S.W.3d 785 (Ark. 2000)
26 S.W.3d 785