From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Walker v. Newsom

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Jun 6, 2022
2:20-cv-2243 TLN AC P (E.D. Cal. Jun. 6, 2022)

Opinion

2:20-cv-2243 TLN AC P

06-06-2022

G. DANIEL WALKER, Plaintiff, v. GAVIN NEWSOM, et al., Defendant.


ORDER

ALLISON CLAIRE, UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE.

Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis with this civil action filed pursuant to Title II of the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), 42 U.S.C § 12132; and Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 (RA), 29 U.S.C. § 794. By order filed May 5, 2022, this case was referred to the court's Post-Screening ADR (Alternative Dispute Resolution) Project and stayed for a period of 120 days. ECF No. 12. That order provided defendants the opportunity to request opting out of the ADR Project based on a good faith belief that a settlement conference would be a waste of resources. Id. at 2. Defendants now request to opt out of the Post-Screening ADR Project and that the stay be lifted. ECF No. 13. Having reviewed the request, the court finds good cause to grant it.

Good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. Defendants' request to opt out of the Post-Screening ADR Project, ECF No. 13, is GRANTED.

2. The stay of this action, commencing May 5, 2022 (ECF No. 12) is LIFTED.

3. Within thirty days of the filing of this order, defendants shall file a response to the complaint.


Summaries of

Walker v. Newsom

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Jun 6, 2022
2:20-cv-2243 TLN AC P (E.D. Cal. Jun. 6, 2022)
Case details for

Walker v. Newsom

Case Details

Full title:G. DANIEL WALKER, Plaintiff, v. GAVIN NEWSOM, et al., Defendant.

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of California

Date published: Jun 6, 2022

Citations

2:20-cv-2243 TLN AC P (E.D. Cal. Jun. 6, 2022)