From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Walker v. Moore

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, E.D. California
Dec 30, 2013
2:13-cv-2626 CKD P (E.D. Cal. Dec. 30, 2013)

Opinion


DARRYL WALKER, Plaintiff, v. MOORE, et al., Defendants. No. 2:13-cv-2626 CKD P United States District Court, E.D. California. December 30, 2013

          ORDER

          CAROLYN K. DELANEY, Magistrate Judge.

         Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed a civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The alleged violations of his civil rights took place in Fresno County, which is part of the Fresno division of this court. See Local Rule 120(d). Pursuant to Local Rule 120(f), a civil action which has not been commenced in the proper division of this court may be transferred to the proper one. Therefore, this action will be transferred to Fresno.

         Good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. This action is transferred to the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California sitting in Fresno; and

2. All future filings shall reference the new Fresno case number assigned and shall be filed at:


Summaries of

Walker v. Moore

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, E.D. California
Dec 30, 2013
2:13-cv-2626 CKD P (E.D. Cal. Dec. 30, 2013)
Case details for

Walker v. Moore

Case Details

Full title:DARRYL WALKER, Plaintiff, v. MOORE, et al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, E.D. California

Date published: Dec 30, 2013

Citations

2:13-cv-2626 CKD P (E.D. Cal. Dec. 30, 2013)