From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Walker v. Merritt-Scully

United States District Court, Middle District of Pennsylvania
Dec 6, 2022
CIVIL 3:21-cv-2167 (M.D. Pa. Dec. 6, 2022)

Opinion

CIVIL 3:21-cv-2167

12-06-2022

GARY WALKER, Plaintiff v. CHCA MERRITT-SCULLY, et al., Defendants


ORDER

Robert D. Mariani United States District Judge

AND NOW, this 6th day of December, 2022, upon consideration of the motion (Doc. 14) to dismiss by Defendant Diamond Pharmacy, and for the reasons set forth in the accompanying Memorandum, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT:

1. The motion (Doc. 14) is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part.

2. Defendant Diamond Pharmacy's motion to dismiss the Eighth Amendment claim is GRANTED.

3. Defendant Diamond Pharmacy's motion to dismiss Plaintiffs medical malpractice claim for failure to file a certificate of merit is DENIED without prejudice to refiling upon compliance with Pa. R. CIV. P. 1042.6.

4. Any appeal from this Order is DEEMED frivolous and not taken in good faith. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3).


Summaries of

Walker v. Merritt-Scully

United States District Court, Middle District of Pennsylvania
Dec 6, 2022
CIVIL 3:21-cv-2167 (M.D. Pa. Dec. 6, 2022)
Case details for

Walker v. Merritt-Scully

Case Details

Full title:GARY WALKER, Plaintiff v. CHCA MERRITT-SCULLY, et al., Defendants

Court:United States District Court, Middle District of Pennsylvania

Date published: Dec 6, 2022

Citations

CIVIL 3:21-cv-2167 (M.D. Pa. Dec. 6, 2022)