From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Walker v. Members of Congress of United States

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
May 22, 2006
180 F. App'x 770 (9th Cir. 2006)

Opinion

Submitted May 15, 2006.

This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

NOT FOR PUBLICATION. (See Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure Rule 36-3)

Bill Walker, Auburn, WA, pro se.

Karen D. Utiger, U.S. Department of Justice Tax Division, Washington, DC, for Defendants-Appellees.


Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Washington, Ricardo S. Martinez, District Judge, Presiding. D.C. No. CV-04-01977-RSM.

Before B. FLETCHER, TROTT and CALLAHAN, Circuit Judges.

MEMORANDUM

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

Bill Walker appeals pro se the district court's judgment dismissing sua sponte for lack of jurisdiction his action alleging that the Members of Congress, the Treasury Secretary, and the Commissioner of Internal Revenue violated the United States Constitution by failing to call a constitutional convention to consider repeal of the Sixteenth Amendment. Walker sought to

Page 771.

hold defendants both civilly and criminally liable, and also sought reparation of federal income taxes that had been "extorted" from him by defendants.

We agree with the district court's determination that it lacked jurisdiction over the action and affirm the dismissal for the reasons stated in the district court's order to show cause, filed on October 8, 2004.

Walker's motion to strike the appellees' brief is denied.

AFFIRMED.


Summaries of

Walker v. Members of Congress of United States

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
May 22, 2006
180 F. App'x 770 (9th Cir. 2006)
Case details for

Walker v. Members of Congress of United States

Case Details

Full title:Bill WALKER, Plaintiff--Appellant, v. MEMBERS OF CONGRESS OF THE UNITED…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit

Date published: May 22, 2006

Citations

180 F. App'x 770 (9th Cir. 2006)