From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Walker v. McNeil

Supreme Court of Florida
Jun 15, 2010
Case No. SC09-2341 (Fla. Jun. 15, 2010)

Opinion

Case No. SC09-2341.

June 15, 2010.

Lower Tribunal No(s). 3D09-1350, 06-32534, 08-21484.


Because a writ of mandamus will not be issued where to do so would prove unavailing or compliance with it would be nugatory or without beneficial results to the petitioner, the petition for writ of mandamus is denied. See State ex rel. Ostroff v. Pearson, 61 So. 2d 325 (Fla. 1952); Campbell v. State ex rel. Garret, 183 So. 340 (Fla. 1938); see also State ex rel. Bergin v. Dunne, 71 So. 2d 746 (Fla. 1954).

All motions or requests for relief are denied.

LEWIS, CANADY, POLSTON, and LABARGA, JJ., concur.

PARIENTE, J., would grant the petition and pet. motion to not abandon the case; would also defer all other pet. motions to the district court.


Summaries of

Walker v. McNeil

Supreme Court of Florida
Jun 15, 2010
Case No. SC09-2341 (Fla. Jun. 15, 2010)
Case details for

Walker v. McNeil

Case Details

Full title:LONNIE WALKER, Petitioner(s) v. WALTER A. MCNEIL, ETC., Respondent(s)

Court:Supreme Court of Florida

Date published: Jun 15, 2010

Citations

Case No. SC09-2341 (Fla. Jun. 15, 2010)