From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Walker v. Man-West Props.

United States District Court, Central District of California
Oct 21, 2021
CV 20-10053 AB (MRWx) (C.D. Cal. Oct. 21, 2021)

Opinion

CV 20-10053 AB (MRWx)

10-21-2021

Walker v. Man-West Properties


Present: Hon. Michael R. Wilner, U.S. Magistrate Judge

CIVIL MINUTES - GENERAL

Proceedings: ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE

1. Plaintiff filed a discovery motion that is not in the joint format mandated under the Local Rules. (Docket # 35.) The motion is accompanied by a statement that indicates that Defendant failed to confer in accordance with this Court's Local Rule 37-1. (Docket #35-2 at 2-3.)

2. A party's failure to file a required document within a deadline set by local rule or to cooperate in the submission of a joint discovery motion "may be deemed consent to the granting [ ] of the motion." Local Rule 7-12. Therefore, Defendant is ORDERED TO SHOW CAUSE for the failure to comply with the joint filing process and to submit a substantive response to the discovery motion by November 5, at 12:00 p.m. If the Court does not receive any submission, the motion will be granted as unopposed under local rule without further proceedings. The Court will also award expenses to the moving party as required under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 37(a)(5).

3. In addition, Mr. Hakimi is ordered to submit a supplemental declaration (NTE five pages) by the same date. The supplemental declaration will explain why, after launching a single meet-and-confer letter to the defense in July - and after receiving additional materials from the defense in August and October Mr. Hakimi apparently made no effort to communicate further with the lawyer representing Ralphs. (Docket # 35-2 at 4.)

4. Mr. Hakimi (who is listed as an attorney on 713 matters in this district court) will also explain how the filing of the October 20 motion complies in letter and spirit with our Court's Civility and Professionalism Guidelines. I particularly note the provisions that attorneys "will treat adverse parties [ ] with fairness and due consideration," and "before filing a motion with the court, we will engage in more than a mere pro forma discussion of its purpose in an effort to resolve the issue with opposing counsel." (CPG at til A.4, B.8.) Hmmnim.

5. If, after consideration of this order, the parties jointly agree that the discovery dispute can be resolved without Court involvement, you may contact the Clerk to dismiss the motion voluntarily.


Summaries of

Walker v. Man-West Props.

United States District Court, Central District of California
Oct 21, 2021
CV 20-10053 AB (MRWx) (C.D. Cal. Oct. 21, 2021)
Case details for

Walker v. Man-West Props.

Case Details

Full title:Walker v. Man-West Properties

Court:United States District Court, Central District of California

Date published: Oct 21, 2021

Citations

CV 20-10053 AB (MRWx) (C.D. Cal. Oct. 21, 2021)