From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Walker v. Litcey Walker Plastering

Supreme Court of Florida
Oct 7, 1964
167 So. 2d 865 (Fla. 1964)

Opinion

No. 33518.

October 7, 1964.

Writ of Certiorari to the Florida Industrial Commission.

Nadler Tunick, Miami, for petitioner.

Charles Desmond Crowley, Fort Lauderdale, for Litcey Walker Plastering; Patrick H. Mears, Tallahassee, and J. Franklin Garner, Lakeland, for Florida Industrial Commission, respondents.


By petition for a writ of certiorari we have for review an order of the Florida Industrial Commission bearing date April 15, 1964.

We find that oral argument would serve no useful purpose and it is therefore dispensed with pursuant to Florida Appellate Rule 3.10, subd. e., 31 F.S.A.

Our consideration of the petition, the record and briefs leads us to conclude that there has been no deviation from the essential requirements of law. The petition is therefore denied.

DREW, C.J., and THORNAL, O'CONNELL, CALDWELL and ERVIN, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Walker v. Litcey Walker Plastering

Supreme Court of Florida
Oct 7, 1964
167 So. 2d 865 (Fla. 1964)
Case details for

Walker v. Litcey Walker Plastering

Case Details

Full title:EDDIE WALKER, PETITIONER, v. LITCEY WALKER PLASTERING AND THE FLORIDA…

Court:Supreme Court of Florida

Date published: Oct 7, 1964

Citations

167 So. 2d 865 (Fla. 1964)