From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Walker v. Jones

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA
Aug 22, 2012
CIV-12-303-RAW-KEW (E.D. Okla. Aug. 22, 2012)

Opinion

CIV-12-303-RAW-KEW

08-22-2012

Julius Jerome Walker, Petitioner, v. Justin Jones, Respondent.


OPINION AND ORDER

Petitioner has filed a petition for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. Respondent is hereby ordered to show cause why the writ should not issue by filing within thirty (30) days an answer to the petition, in accordance with Rule 5 of the Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases. As an alternative to filing a Rule 5 answer, Respondent may file within thirty (30) days a motion to dismiss based upon 28 U.S.C. § 2244,28 U.S.C. § 2254, or other applicable statute. Extensions of time will be granted for good cause only, and in no event for longer than an additional twenty (20) days, Petitioner may submit a reply to the Respondent's answer or motion within fifteen (15) days after the filing of Respondent's pleading.

IT IS SO ORDERED THIS 22nd day of August, 2012.

_________________

KIMBERLY E. WEST

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE


Summaries of

Walker v. Jones

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA
Aug 22, 2012
CIV-12-303-RAW-KEW (E.D. Okla. Aug. 22, 2012)
Case details for

Walker v. Jones

Case Details

Full title:Julius Jerome Walker, Petitioner, v. Justin Jones, Respondent.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA

Date published: Aug 22, 2012

Citations

CIV-12-303-RAW-KEW (E.D. Okla. Aug. 22, 2012)