From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Walker v. Hixton

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Dec 8, 2023
2:23-cv-2711 DB P (E.D. Cal. Dec. 8, 2023)

Opinion

2:23-cv-2711 DB P

12-08-2023

TYRONE WALKER, Petitioner, v. A. HIXTON, Respondent.


ORDER

DEBORAH BARNES UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, filed an application for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. Petitioner has not, however, filed an in forma pauperis affidavit or paid the required filing fee ($5.00). See 28 U.S.C. §§ 1914(a); 1915(a). Petitioner will be provided the opportunity to either submit the appropriate affidavit in support of a request to proceed in forma pauperis or submit the appropriate filing fee.

In accordance with the above, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. Petitioner shall submit, within thirty days from the date of this order, an affidavit in support of his request to proceed in forma pauperis or the appropriate filing fee; petitioner's failure to comply with this order will result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed; and

2. The Clerk of the Court is directed to send petitioner a copy of the in forma pauperis form used by this district.


Summaries of

Walker v. Hixton

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Dec 8, 2023
2:23-cv-2711 DB P (E.D. Cal. Dec. 8, 2023)
Case details for

Walker v. Hixton

Case Details

Full title:TYRONE WALKER, Petitioner, v. A. HIXTON, Respondent.

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of California

Date published: Dec 8, 2023

Citations

2:23-cv-2711 DB P (E.D. Cal. Dec. 8, 2023)