From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Walker v. Goetz

Court of Civil Appeals of Texas, El Paso
Feb 12, 1920
218 S.W. 571 (Tex. Civ. App. 1920)

Opinion

No. 1043.

January 22, 1920. Rehearing Denied February 12, 1920.

Error from Midland County Court; J. M. De Armond, Judge.

Action by Chas. E. Goetz against Mrs. John Walker. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendant brings error. Affirmed.

Garrard Baker, of Midland, for plaintiff in error.

B. Frank Haag, of Midland, for defendant in error.


This is a companion case to the case of Mrs. John Walker v. C. E. Goetz, 218 S.W. 569, this day decided by this court. The pleadings of both parties, the evidence, and the proceedings had herein are practically the same as in the former case, except that in this case the husband did not join the wife in the execution of the promissory note, and, as required by articles 1840 and 1841, Vernon's Sayles' Civil Statutes, as to the husband, while joined in the suit with the wife, no judgment was rendered against him.

The judgment is affirmed.


Summaries of

Walker v. Goetz

Court of Civil Appeals of Texas, El Paso
Feb 12, 1920
218 S.W. 571 (Tex. Civ. App. 1920)
Case details for

Walker v. Goetz

Case Details

Full title:WALKER v. GOETZ

Court:Court of Civil Appeals of Texas, El Paso

Date published: Feb 12, 1920

Citations

218 S.W. 571 (Tex. Civ. App. 1920)