From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Walker v. Dunn

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE WESTERN DIVISION
Jan 24, 2017
No. 2:16-cv-02279-STA-tmp (W.D. Tenn. Jan. 24, 2017)

Opinion

No. 2:16-cv-02279-STA-tmp

01-24-2017

SHERMAN WALKER, Plaintiff, v. J.E. DUNN, Defendant.


ORDER ADOPTING THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S RECOMMENDATION AND DENYING DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO DISMISS WITHOUT PREJUDICE

Before the Court is Defendant J.E. Dunn's Motion to Dismiss (ECF No. 14) for lack of personal jurisdiction, insufficient process, insufficient service of process, and failure to state a claim. The United States Magistrate Judge entered a report and recommendation on January 4, 2017, recommending that Defendant's Motion be denied without prejudice. Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72, Defendant had fourteen (14) days from the service of the Magistrate Judge's report in which to file objections. Defendant did not object to the report, and the time for filing objections has now passed. Having reviewed the report and recommendation de novo, the Court hereby ADOPTS the Magistrate Judge's recommendation. Defendant's Motion to Dismiss is DENIED without prejudice to re-file.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

s/ S. Thomas Anderson

S. THOMAS ANDERSON

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Date: January 24, 2017


Summaries of

Walker v. Dunn

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE WESTERN DIVISION
Jan 24, 2017
No. 2:16-cv-02279-STA-tmp (W.D. Tenn. Jan. 24, 2017)
Case details for

Walker v. Dunn

Case Details

Full title:SHERMAN WALKER, Plaintiff, v. J.E. DUNN, Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE WESTERN DIVISION

Date published: Jan 24, 2017

Citations

No. 2:16-cv-02279-STA-tmp (W.D. Tenn. Jan. 24, 2017)