Summary
In Walker v. City of Cincinnati, 21 Ohio St. 14, 8 Am. Rep., 24, the court sustained the plan to build the Cincinnati Southern Railway and then lease it to an operating company. It was held that that was not a violation of Section 6 of Article VIII, Ohio Constitution, and while the soundness of the decision has been questioned in other respects, it has been consistently approved and followed on that point.
Summary of this case from Kittel v. City of CincinnatiOpinion
Case Number: 1:17cv575
01-09-2018
Terry Walker, Plaintiff(s), v. City of Cincinnati Department of Building and Inspections, et al., Defendant(s).
ORDER
The Court has reviewed the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Karen L. Litkovitz filed on November 8, 2017 (Doc. 6), to whom this case was referred pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §636(b), and noting that no objections have been filed thereto and that the time for filing such objections under Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b) expired November 18, 2017, hereby ADOPTS said Report and Recommendation.
Accordingly, plaintiff's complaint is DISMISSED with prejudice.
The Court certifies pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §1915(a) that for the foregoing reasons an appeal of any Order adopting the Report and Recommendation will not be taken in good faith, therefore, denying plaintiff leave to appeal in forma pauperis. Plaintiff remains free to apply to proceed in forma pauperis in the Court of Appeals. See Callihan v. Schneider, 178 F.3d 800, 803 (6 Cir. 1999), overruling in part Floyd v. United States Postal Serv., 105 F.3d 274, 277 (6 Cir. 1997).
IT IS SO ORDERED.
/s/_________
Judge Susan J. Dlott
United States District Judge