From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Walker v. Bridge

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Nov 18, 2021
21 Civil 474 (VEC) (S.D.N.Y. Nov. 18, 2021)

Opinion

21 Civil 474 (VEC)

11-18-2021

KELLIE WALKER, Plaintiff, v. TRIBOROUGH BRIDGE AND TUNNEL AUTHORITY, D/B/A METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY BRIDGES AND TUNNELS, VICTOR MUALLEM, and SHARON GALLO-KOTCHER, IN THEIR INDIVIDUAL AND PROFESSIONAL CAPACITIES, Defendants.


JUDGMENT

It is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED: That for the reasons stated in the Court's Memorandum Opinion and Order dated November 18, 2021, Defendants' Motion to Dismiss is GRANTED. Walker's Section 1981, Section 1983 and Title VII claims are DISMISSED with prejudice. Walker's state law claims are DISMISSED without prejudice.


Summaries of

Walker v. Bridge

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Nov 18, 2021
21 Civil 474 (VEC) (S.D.N.Y. Nov. 18, 2021)
Case details for

Walker v. Bridge

Case Details

Full title:KELLIE WALKER, Plaintiff, v. TRIBOROUGH BRIDGE AND TUNNEL AUTHORITY, D/B/A…

Court:United States District Court, S.D. New York

Date published: Nov 18, 2021

Citations

21 Civil 474 (VEC) (S.D.N.Y. Nov. 18, 2021)