From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Walker v. Beal

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION
Oct 26, 2012
Civil Action No. 3:12-cv-2389-O (N.D. Tex. Oct. 26, 2012)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 3:12-cv-2389-O

10-26-2012

ROBERT R. WALKER, Plaintiff, v. SPENCER BEAL, et al., Defendants.


ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATION

OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

The United States Magistrate Judge made findings, conclusions and a recommendation in this case. No objections were filed. The District Court reviewed the proposed findings, conclusions and recommendation for plain error. Finding none, the Court ACCEPTS the Findings, Conclusions and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge.

Accordingly, Plaintiff's Fair Housing Act and tax fraud claims are DISMISSED with prejudice under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2), his Americans with Disabilities Act claim are DISMISSED without prejudice under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a), and any remaining state law claims are DISMISSED without prejudice.

______________________

Reed O'Connor

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Walker v. Beal

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION
Oct 26, 2012
Civil Action No. 3:12-cv-2389-O (N.D. Tex. Oct. 26, 2012)
Case details for

Walker v. Beal

Case Details

Full title:ROBERT R. WALKER, Plaintiff, v. SPENCER BEAL, et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION

Date published: Oct 26, 2012

Citations

Civil Action No. 3:12-cv-2389-O (N.D. Tex. Oct. 26, 2012)

Citing Cases

Orr v. St. Louis Union Trust Co.

(1) The evidence conclusively shows an agreement created between the husband and wife, expressing the…

In re Polansky

With respect to trustees it is thoroughly settled that compensation may, and should, be denied them if it be…