From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Walker v. Barnwell

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Jul 11, 1986
122 A.D.2d 605 (N.Y. App. Div. 1986)

Opinion

July 11, 1986

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Erie County, NeMoyer, J.

Present — Callahan, J.P., Doerr, Denman, Balio and Schnepp, JJ.


Judgment unanimously affirmed, without costs. Memorandum: Viewing the trial evidence in a light most favorable to defendant, we conclude that defendant was driving her vehicle in the extreme right, northbound lane between 30 to 40 miles per hour in a 45-mile-per-hour zone, when plaintiff's vehicle, traveling southbound, made an unexpected left turn into a fast-food restaurant across two lanes of northbound traffic about 50 feet in front of defendant's vehicle. Defendant immediately applied her brakes, but skidded into the right rear passenger side of plaintiff's car. Upon these facts, we find that defendant was entitled to a charge on the emergency rule (PJI 2:14). Defendant driver was confronted by a sudden and unforeseen occurrence not of her own making; thus the question of whether her conduct was reasonable in the face of an emergency was properly one for the jury (Ferrer v Harris, 55 N.Y.2d 285, 292-293, mod 56 N.Y.2d 737). We have reviewed the charge and find it to be proper in all respects.

We have examined plaintiff's remaining contentions and find them to be without merit.


Summaries of

Walker v. Barnwell

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Jul 11, 1986
122 A.D.2d 605 (N.Y. App. Div. 1986)
Case details for

Walker v. Barnwell

Case Details

Full title:CARRIE WALKER, Appellant, v. DONALD BARNWELL et al., Respondents

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Jul 11, 1986

Citations

122 A.D.2d 605 (N.Y. App. Div. 1986)

Citing Cases

Varsi v. Stoll

We conclude that the jury's exoneration of DeMartino and Pilot was neither erroneous as a matter of law nor…

Rivera v. New York City Transit Authority

The reasonableness of the course of action pursued by the motorman after the emergency arose is not disputed.…