From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Walker v. Barnett

United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit
Apr 12, 2021
No. 20-3199 (8th Cir. Apr. 12, 2021)

Opinion

No. 20-3199

04-12-2021

Clayton Walker Plaintiff - Appellant v. Steve Barnett, Secretary of State; Marcia Hultman, Department of Labor Defendants - Appellees United States of America; Unknown Federal Persons Defendants


Appeal from United States District Court for the District of South Dakota - Southern [Unpublished] Before GRUENDER, MELLOY, and KELLY, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM.

South Dakota resident Clayton Walker appeals the district court's dismissal of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action. Having carefully reviewed the record and the parties' briefs, we conclude that the court did not abuse its discretion in dismissing the complaint for failure to properly serve the defendants. See Mac v. Dillon, 594 F.3d 620, 622 (8th Cir. 2010) (per curiam) (standard of review). We also deny the motion for PACER access as moot. Accordingly, the judgment is affirmed. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

The Honorable Karen E. Schreier, United States District Judge for the District of South Dakota. --------


Summaries of

Walker v. Barnett

United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit
Apr 12, 2021
No. 20-3199 (8th Cir. Apr. 12, 2021)
Case details for

Walker v. Barnett

Case Details

Full title:Clayton Walker Plaintiff - Appellant v. Steve Barnett, Secretary of State…

Court:United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit

Date published: Apr 12, 2021

Citations

No. 20-3199 (8th Cir. Apr. 12, 2021)