From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Walker v. Arpindo Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Jun 29, 1993
194 A.D.2d 503 (N.Y. App. Div. 1993)

Opinion

June 29, 1993

Appeal from the Supreme Court, New York County (Edward H. Lehner, J.).


Any right plaintiff may have had to repudiate the settlement agreement because of failure to timely tender in full the initial $100,000 deposit or other breaches thereof was vitiated when plaintiff ratified the agreement by retaining the benefit of the $75,000 actually paid (see, Bank Leumi Trust Co. v. D'Evori Intl., 163 A.D.2d 26). CPLR 3004 is inapplicable to claims of contractual right to repudiate, and plaintiff's unsupported claims for rescission and reformation were properly dismissed summarily.

We have considered plaintiff's remaining arguments and find them to be without merit.

Concur — Sullivan, J.P., Carro, Wallach and Nardelli, JJ.


Summaries of

Walker v. Arpindo Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Jun 29, 1993
194 A.D.2d 503 (N.Y. App. Div. 1993)
Case details for

Walker v. Arpindo Corp.

Case Details

Full title:FREDERIC WALKER, Appellant, v. ARPINDO CORPORATION et al., Respondents

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Jun 29, 1993

Citations

194 A.D.2d 503 (N.Y. App. Div. 1993)
599 N.Y.S.2d 567

Citing Cases

Rosenblum v. Rosenblum

However, assuming the term were found to be material after trial, any right Bernice had to repudiate the…

Netherby Ltd. v. G.V. Trademark Investments, Ltd.

Appeal from the Supreme Court, New York County (Ira Gammerman, J.). CPLR 3004 does not avail plaintiff…